Mon 16 Feb 2009
Silica in cosmetics.
Posted by MollyLoretta under Beauty Blog
[47] Comments
Disclaimer: No, I am not affiliated with Coastal Scents. No, I do not personally care about the personal issue between Erica and Coastal Scents — it is between them, and irrelevant to this post. This post is strictly about the use of silica microspheres in or as a cosmetic, not companies that sell them. Thanks.
I’m sure at this point in time that many of you cosmetic enthusiasts have seen this particular video on YouTube. I saw it over a week ago, among looking for reviews on different silica powders from different websites so that I can bring you, my readers, the best there is.
This video, and the links listed, are causing quite a scare — and for no necessary reason. I’ve decided to research the use of silica in cosmetics to bring you the most up-to-date information. Now, you may ask, why did I bother to do that?
Because I personally do not believe the FDA or OSHA would allow so much silica in cosmetics if it were dangerous; it would be a lawsuit waiting to happen from make up artists who use the product regularly (basically, even a long term MAC employee would have lung issues since it’s an prominent ingredient in their Studio Fix powder and foundation). Let alone would they allow Make Up For Ever to release a 100% silica powder. As a cosmetologist, we have to learn extensive knowledge regarding OSHA, and there is just no way this would be approved in as many cosmetic products as it is. (The FDA regulates any known carcinogens, and they are NOT allowed to be ingredients in cosmetics! Silica microspheres [or just silica, in general, like silica, silicone, dimethicone, etc.] is NOT a regulated ingredient! If an ingredient has not been tested for safety and is in a product, it is required to put “Warning: The safety of this product has not been tested” visible on the label to be sold in the USA.)
Let’s get down to the nitty-gritty, shall we?
The first thing I noticed that was inaccurate regarding the information is they are talking about crystalline form silica — not the silica used in cosmetics (silica approved for use in cosmetics is microspheres, a round formation of silica). Crystalline silica and silica microspheres are not even processed the same, so no, they do not later come into contact with each other and contaminate the finished product. The main concern for silicosis comes down to the industrial workers who handle mass quantities of crystalline silica; from my research they are required to wear masks in order to protect themselves.
Another thing that bothered me regarding the video is that there is no definitive answer on how much silica one would have to inhale to get silicosis. Any sort of research that was wholeheartedly taken on this particular stand would have that information — and information I cannot find, which makes any silica in cosmetics claim of being dangerous completely unwarranted.
Now, why is this? Because the type of silica used in cosmetics is completely different than the type of silica that is a known carcinogen. (2)
Next, if silica is such a problem, why don’t we see an issue with silicone? Silicone is derived from silica, and is a prominent ingredient in every single foundation primer, eyeshadow primer, and even some foundations. Plus, it’s the main constituent of sand — wouldn’t we be screwed just by going to the beach?
Then there is the reference of Wikipedia. I have nothing against Wikipedia, and it’s a great way to get information about pop culture — but as most of us know, Wikipedia is never necessarily true. Any single person can register and change information on any page without citing their sources and whether or not the information is valid.
Next, let’s examine the uses of silica in cosmetics — why do we use them, anyway?
The role silica plays in cosmetics is that it absorbs sweat and oil, keeping your skin from becoming a nasty grease slick and assists in keeping your make up on your face for a longer period of time. The spherical type of silica improves the smoothness and spread of your foundation or powder (mind you, spherical silica is the only type approved by OSHA and the FDA for use in cosmetics). It’s probably one of the top oil absorbors, and just look — you’ll most likely find it in the powder you’re using. (It’s also one of the top 3 minerals found on earth!)
Now, why does it say in the video you cannot use them without mixing?
The main intent is to mix your silica with another product to make your own mineral powder foundation, silica will improve the wear of your foundation, and when you wear a powder…. Well, we all know that they aren’t the longest wearing of substances. Can you use it alone? Of course, but it’s not the intent that it’s sold with (at least not on Coastal Scents).
The type of silica used in cosmetics is in the amorphous form, which means there is no clear order to the formation of atoms, unlike crystalline silica, where there is a clear form to the order of the atoms. (4) In other words, the type of silica that causes cancer (crystalline silica) is not even the same chemical make up as silica microspheres (the kind approved for use in cosmetics).
According to the Cosmetics Database: Silica is the most common constituent of sand. Fine silica, typically used in industrial applications and inhaled by workers, is associated with a wide range of disorders. In cosmetics for skin use, regular sand presents little, if any risk to people. Because the particles might be finely ground down for use in a product that might be inhaled (such as a facial powder), the inhalation scores reflect the underlying data.
I can’t wait until this is brought to the attention of Paula Begoun, as she will just tear into this — and she has far more connections than I do, and will be able to thoroughly get deep down into this topic for us. When she posts any information, you can bet that I will post it here.
So, what’s the consensus? The type of silica in cosmetics is safe for use since it is in spherical form, different from the known carcinogens and issues behind the previously mentioned video (research shows silica microspheres are SAFE!). Use silica freely, there’s no skin issues what-so-ever unless you have an allergic reaction, which would be very unique to you and few other users.
Hope I helped, readers! XOXO
Added information 3/18/2009:
I recently came across an article stating the uses and researches regarding silica in cosmetics are out-dated and unfair to the cosmetic industry. It’s from a dermatologist (I’ve had a lot of fun reading about silica and dermatology, did you know that they have replaced it as an emulsifier in many moisturizers?! Fantastic!), and it’s a very interesting read. I’m going to include the link for you all so you can get some extra information.
“Basic Silica is silicon dioxide or SiO2, it occurs in a crystalline state, an amorphous (shapeless) state and in impure forms such as quartz, opal and sand. It is the primary constituent of the Earth’s crust. It is usually found in the form of silicates. Silicones are synthetic polymers and are made by combining oxygen and silicon in high temperatures and pressures. In cosmetics the crystalline form of silica is being avoided for health and safety reasons and only the amorphous forms and silicates are being used….“ (Make sure you read the last paragraph, it’s very crucial to the information I’ve provided here!)
Sources:
1. http://www.chemistryquestion.com/English/Questions/ChemistryInDailyLife/40c_silica_cosmetics.html
2. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2006-110/
3. http://www.priorartdatabase.com/IPCOM/000133571/
4. http://www.cosmeticsinfo.org/ingredient_details.php?ingredient_id=948
5. http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/ingredient.php?ingred06=705911¬hanks=1

47 Responses to “ Silica in cosmetics. ”
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
[...] http://mollyloretta.com/wordpress/?p=127 [...]
-
[...] !!!!!Coastal Scents Controversy!!!!! PLEASE WATCH Silica in cosmetics. read that it should clear up any outstanding concerns about silica in cosmetics. bottom line: [...]
-
[...] who are still concerned about silica in cosmetics I found this page linked from xsparkage’s website Silica in cosmetics. Just a little more info for anyone who is concerned or just wants to be more knowledgeable [...]
-
[...] from youtube linked on her blog after the whole Coastal Scents debate, it is an interesting read. Silica in cosmetics. I do agree that we need to be concerned with what products we use etc, but using anything above [...]
-
[...] Silica in cosmetics Posted by root 6 hours ago (http://mollyloretta.com) Fine silica typically used in industrial applications and inhaled by workers i 39 ve only ordered from coastal scents once and i 39 m not a die hard fan leave a comment click here to cancel reply name required is powered by wordpress 2 7 1 and delivered t Discuss | Bury | News | Silica in cosmetics [...]
-
[...] Silica in cosmetics Posted by root 7 hours ago (http://mollyloretta.com) Fine silica typically used in industrial applications and inhaled by workers i 39 ve only ordered from coastal scents once and i 39 m not a die hard fan leave a comment click here to cancel reply name required is powered by wordpress 2 7 1 and delivered t Discuss | Bury | News | Silica in cosmetics [...]
-
[...] Silica in cosmetics Posted by root 5 hours ago (http://mollyloretta.com) In cosmetics the crystalline form of silica is being avoided for health and safety reasons and only the amorphous forms and silicates are being used comment click here to cancel reply name required is powered by wordpress is powered by wordpress 2 7 1 and Discuss | Bury | News | Silica in cosmetics [...]
-
[...] Silica in cosmetics Posted by root 2 hours 42 minutes ago (http://mollyloretta.com) It from a dermatologist i 39 ve had a lot of fun reading about silica t discuss bury news silica in cosmetics leave a comment is powered by wordpress 2 7 1 and delivered to you in 1 195 seconds using 25 queries Discuss | Bury | News | Silica in cosmetics [...]
-
[...] Silica in cosmetics Posted by root 31 minutes ago (http://mollyloretta.com) I just received my order of the silica microsphere powder today and i 39 m the analogy would be something like cigarette companies wouldn 39 t sell bury news silica in cosmetics leave a comment is powered by wordpress 2 7 1 is powered by wordpress 2 8 and Discuss | Bury | News | Silica in cosmetics [...]





Well stated. Thank you for this well informed bit of information! This was my concern when I heard the issues brought forward with using Silica. I also felt the health references were more applicable towards industrial applications and not cosmetics but did not have enough information to back that up. You have cleared that up for many people.
One thing which concerns me is the MSDS information listed on CS. I am also a licensed beauty professional and we are always provided an MSDS directly from the manufacturer… this is not the case with CS… so how do we all know just “what” it is that she is selling? She should provide that information in proper form. Those sketchy tactics are what worry me the most (ie: her changing so much information on her site to try and repair comments from other people)… I am also sad by the way she treats her “fan base”…
Reply
Ro Reply:
February 16th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
I forgot to mention… how would we know if it was amorphous hydrated silica if CS is not even sure what they sell? I have read this particular silica may be contaminated with small amounts of crystalline quartz.
The crystalline quartz in this silica is considered to be carcinogenic.
That is my concern!
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 16th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
Hi Ro! Thanks for taking interest in the article. I would assume since CS is aware they are selling silica microspheres, that they are 100% safe. Silica microspheres are completely non-damaging. MSDS sheets are only required for nationally recognized companies; since CS is not one they would not be required to send them. I’m sure if you sent a request to find her personal distributor saying you want additional information she’d be more than happy to oblige. Silica microspheres are easy to find and purchase for those interested in creating cosmetics, there are many ingredient distributors available in the US (as I’m sure you are aware). I’d imagine that she purchases in bulk to sell, simple enough. I was looking at creating my own skincare around a year ago (no time now), and getting approved ingredients is very simple. Since silica microspheres are very different from crystalline silica, and they’re not even from the exact same source nor the same chemical make up, logically, the CS silica should be fine. Otherwise, TK Trading sells microspheres for a great deal and they do offer more information regarding the product. I hope that helps some! It’s a good idea, I should try to contact them to get the information to put an end to this unnecessary scare.
Reply
Ro Reply:
February 16th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Gosh, you make such great points! I have to say that I have been a loyal customer of CS and never had any complaints whatsoever… AND just a day prior to this, I placed a several hundred $$ order for mineral makeup stuff from CS.
I just hope that everyone is able to take a step back for a moment and reconsider their opinion of Silica usage..
I gather from this post that using it as 100% is safe for cosmetic application?
Thanks so much for your level-headed and well researched information! I really appreciate it!
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 16th, 2009 at 6:20 pm
@Ro
I found this, thought you might want to check out! I got ahold of the MSDS sheets on Coastal Scents, here you go!
http://www.coastalscents.com/cfwebstore/index.cfm/category/87/msds-data-sheets.cfm
Reply
GREAT article! It’s about time someone did some research on this! And the sources you provide are great for additional information!
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 16th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
Thanks for reading! I figured someone needed to, considering her sources stated nothing regarding cosmetic grade silica, just industrial grade silica — they don’t even have the same chemical make up! If we were using industrial grade silica on our faces I think we’d all be a great big bloody mess by now (crystalline shapes would definitely abrade the stratum corneum!), and it’s not the case.
Reply
Thank you for stating some much needed facts; with all of the recent mud slinging, it is nice to know where I can come to for quality content (and where to stop, on top of that).
Reply
Thank you for this article!
Anyway, I do have one thing to say/type. Screw Coastal Scents. Calling a LOYAL customer ignorant is so uncalled for. And it is not the first time they do something in that fashion. Another thing that bothers me is that Leesha aka xsparkage is wining about comments she gets from people. Well if she doesn’t want comments then she should get off of youtube. I love her videos but why is she sticking up for C.S? BTW, I don’t even care about the powder I just can not believe Coastal Scents has shady buisness(sp?) ethics.
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 16th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Personally, I’ve done very little business with Coastal Scents. I’ve heard mostly good things, not much regarding the poor customer service I’ve been hearing about recently. I am extremely curious, however! Could you send me references by any chance of this, is there a forum somewhere? I don’t want to refer my readers to a site with poor customer service. You can e-mail me at molly.loretta@gmail.com, you don’t have to post it here if you don’t want
For another inexpensive silica microspheres option, I recommend TK Trading! They have a minimum purchase, but it’s easy to get $20 worth of product together since they have such a vast selection of items.
Reply
Ro Reply:
February 16th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
I agree that CS’s reactions were in poor taste… and to me it sounds like Kathy reacted emotionally without consideration to the gal who had posted the videos… After all, she (Erice) was not bashing CS at all! I am sure she (Kathy) realizes this after the fact. It will affect her business and that is too bad. What is done, is done and hopefully she will learn from this public mistake.
Its kind of a tough time with this econmy to be loosing your loyal customers because you are unable to articulate appropiately.
I will consider taking my business elsewhere which makes me sad. I like CS, have had great customer service and love the products I get! One thing that is important to me is integrity within a business…
Possibly she has learned something about her reactions… maybe she should have gone directly to the source instead of reacting on a public forum!? Just my ranting thoughts.
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 16th, 2009 at 7:13 pm
@sandra, also, I think as far as Leesha goes, I don’t think she really deserves the hateful comments she gets. Quite frankly, if you don’t like it, you don’t have to watch, there’s no reason to flame ANYBODY. I don’t understand why the CS owner would flame Erice, and I don’t see why anyone would flame Leesha. Sure, it’s a free country, but I don’t see why people have to be so negative to others over miniscule things. Is Erice who posted the video I linked? It’s not her fault for being misinformed.
Reply
Leesha Reply:
February 17th, 2009 at 11:44 am
@sandra, when did I ever say I was sticking up for CS in this matter?
Reply
Wow you did a great job and love the level headedness. I had intentionally avoided YT since I saw the original video and saw her followup the night she posted. Truth be told I just stopped wathing it. I knew drama would unfold. :O) But thank you again. I got my silica from TKB Trading and am happy. I’ve bought things from CS and was very happy with what I got and my service. The shipping was fast (I live in CA) and products where great.
I think people are making a big deal out of the CS and Erica situation. To me BOTH parties acted poorly. CS is not some big monolithic company like MAC. It’s a small family run business who buys products wholesale and resells them here. NOTHING wrong with that. A lot of people are happy with their products and service from CS. For those who aren’t they don’t shop there anymore. GREAT.
Erica was wrong because – she DID call out CS. Her video was named “CS IS NOT MUFE HD”. She didn’t name it “Possible problems with Silica Spheres” and did very sketchy research based on some “professional makeup artist” (like we would know that online) statement and some wikipedia and California information. All of which was evident she got from someone else. Unfortunately, even if some of us do research, MOST don’t. CS reacted poorly by linking her video and calling her ignorant. To me Erica acted poorly making a “sympathy” video. Quite frankly they both just reacted which is what people do.
Personally, I’m new to youtube. I like my gurus but I am not into guru hating or bashing. I get a strong sense that some gurus don’t like the popularity of others or how they recommend products and companies, especially if that guru had a problem with the company/product. I love you guys but remember this, YT (and you) are not the end all be all. This is life, Erica is not some poor little victim and CS is not some big bad wolf. They need to talk, squash this whole thing and keep it moving. Life is just too dang short for all this drama. :O)
P.S. I haven’t seen the Xsparkage backlash, but Ms. Molly or Ms. Ro (I couldn’t quite get you all straight, sorry :O) that’s the kind of emails, calls the lady from CS was saying she got when the video both surfaced. When I read her page she said she was getting a lot of concerned folks and I”m sure all were not as level headed as you are. Me personally I think that’s why she reacted (I mean look at the poster above ranting at xsparkage for even DARING to take her own stand for CS who she’s had NO problems with). When you’re a small business and alot of your customers are coming from a source (i.e. YT) and someone, for lack of a better word, negligently, exposes you to possible liability with the click of a camara, well you get scared. I get Kathy isn’t some uber savvy business woman. It seems to me she used to make her own cosmetics, saw a void in the market and filled it.
I agree they should talk it out and CS should do a weekend customer appreciation sale. i.e. free shipping and/or some percentage off. :O) Molly if you talk to her maybe as one business woman to another you could suggest it since you don’t have any anemosity towards her. :O)
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 17th, 2009 at 5:01 am
@T.R., I think the issue between CS and Erica is just that, between them. Realistically my post had nothing to do with either of them, rather the silica microspheres that were sold and the misinformation that she posted. She read the information she was given, and yes posted without research or thinking, but I assume it was for the concern for the consumer — not directly intent to damage CS (to be fair, CS isn’t MUFE, if only for MUFE microspheres are more finely ground). CS is a young company and it’s a good opportunity to learn and grow from this issue. I can understand both parties, and have not seen nor do I particularly care to see Erica’s second YT video. Honestly, I had never even seen a video from her before that particular one.
Reply
T.R. Reply:
February 17th, 2009 at 10:37 am
@MollyLoretta, you are absolutely correct!! I apologize if I came off a little harsh. :O) I was getting a little frustrated with all the bashing and may have inadvertently added to it. :O) I have a nasty habit of trying to see both sides and sometimes it may appear I lean to one especially if appears everyone else (not specifally you) leans to the other. :O) I’d never even heard of her either before this incident.
Again, I thank you greatly for your researched and level response to the situation.
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 17th, 2009 at 10:57 am
@T.R., honestly the whole thing is blatantly confusing to me. I’ve gotten hatemail saying now that I’m a CS supporter and they’re so bad for just posting information on silica? My apologies as well, because it is sincerely frustrating! Haha. I guess that’s the internet, though.
Reply
It’s getting old. REally it is. And why does it seem to me like you are almost in a way trying to “stick up” for a company that has done nothing but bash sweet girls on youtube!? I have been a YT watcher for a long time and I have never heard and seen so many horrible unprofessional things about a company in such a period of time. It’s sad how pathetic this company is. Maybe you should do your homework before trying to defend a company that is as tacky as CS, is.
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 17th, 2009 at 5:09 am
@lou, this post is really irrelevant to a company. It’s about the misinformation that was unintentionally spread about the use of silica as A. a cosmetic, and B. in cosmetics. I’m not going to defend nor bash CS, I’ve barely worked with the company aside from purchasing silica and sifters, in fact, that’s the only time I’ve purchased anything from there. I don’t go on YT to read customer service reviews, just tutorials for personal inspiratoon, product reviews, and of course music videos. From what I’ve been told CS did handle the situation poorly, but all I’ve heard was what is posted here. As I’ve said, neither defending nor bashing, I’m just trying to inform regarding silica, not get in the middle of someone else’s situation.
Reply
Thanks for posting this information. Quite frankly, I find the video put up by Erikaleigh ignorant and hysterical, with false claims made about this product. Coastal Scents had every right to respond to it. The second video she put up was even worse and contained more attention seeking drama-mongering.
I’ve only ordered from Coastal Scents once and I’m not a die hard fan. I think that they overcharge for the palettes and international postage compared to Ebay sellers. However, they still have a right as a business to respond to false claims that can affect their livlihood. And ‘ignorant’ in this case was the correct term to use, so why not? Why do people get so hysterical over honesty?
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 17th, 2009 at 5:20 am
@inspersia, I don’t think name-calling was directly right from a customer service perspective. I’ve only seen her first video admist looking at silica reviews (I’m trying to compile a list of places to order the microspheres) when I came across her original video ; it didn’t make sense to me, really, but I left it and went about my day until I got bad-mouthed for trying to promote the sale of silica on my minorly read blog. Thus leading to yesterday morning’s post. I think whatever happened between CS and Erica is between them, I’ve done business with CS very little, don’t know nor have I communicated with Erica and don’t have the interest in getting involved with whatever happened, really. I just want to provide information and review products, and now people are angry with me for not badmouthing a company I’ve had no problem with, nor have I heard of one until this morning.
Reply
Molly I’m sorry to hear you are having to go through the “hate mail” simply for providing information to disspell any misinformation and for not taking sides.
You’re right about the internet. :O) I also have to remember a lot of these girls are still very young. :O) Have a wonderful day and week for that matter.
Reply
Molly, I’m also sorry that you are on the receiving end of that nonsense. Their sense of entitlement is showing.
Reply
HI mollyloretta!!
thank you for the information you have provided to all who are concerned with the use of silica microspheres. I have done some research over the web from scientific journals to beauty blogs on the net. I have concluded that it is safe to use…but I was wondering if it is safe to use on skin alone? Would it be safe to use as for example a setting powder or to set under eye concealer? Thank you so much for your time.
truly yours,
jacky
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 18th, 2009 at 4:00 pm
@jacqueline Peraza,
Hi Jacqueline! That is an excellent question. From the research I conducted, it concluded that silica microspheres are 100% safe to use regardless — they’re harmless mixed with other ingredients, and harmless used alone. I like using it alone, personally, because it doesn’t add more coverage that I don’t need, and just helps to absorb oilies throughout the day. Of course, you’ll need less product since it will be so highly concentrated, so only a little would be needed to cover your whole face. Don’t worry about inhaling, the little spheres are safe and non-carcinogenic! Since they’re not the crystalline form of silica (a completely different chemical make up, and those crystals ARE a carcinogen!), they are as safe as you can get. Even very, very, very few allergic reactions and skin irritations have been seen through research with the product, as far as I’m aware even less than show an allergy to parabens (though, even only 3% of study groups show a reaction to parabens, silly mineral companies trying to scare us away from making our make up have a longer shelf life!)! So, unless you are one of the VERY few that has an allergic reaction, you are totally 100% safe.
Reply
jacqueline Peraza Reply:
February 19th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
@MollyLoretta,
Thank you so very much for your reply! You have cleared up all my questions and concerns. I just received my order of the silica microsphere powder today and I’m eager to try it out. God bless you and again, thank you so, so much!
Reply
Uh…the FDA constantly lets products go that they know cause issues until they get enough proof and enough outrage from consumers to take it off the market.
Parabens appear in many products and they still have not taken notice. Aluminum in deodorants have been linked in numerous studies to breast cancers and even alzheimers and yet it is still produced. Don’t expect the FDA to be a constant watchguard for your health. They are most often a step behind. You have to do your own research and ask your own questions to protect your own health.
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
February 27th, 2009 at 10:48 am
The problem is is that half the information provided for anything is false. I’m writing a blog right now about titanium dioxide & aluminum in deodorant and how it is actually linked to cancer (both of them have caused a scare for it, so I figured I’d compile it into one).
I did do the research, and crystalline silica IS in fact a carcinogen…. Silica microspheres, on the other hand, are NOT…. It is due to the chemical make up of the entire product, which is separate for both. The issue is specifically for those mining silica, and using crystalline silica for making product. There have been very few skin reactions to silica microspheres, let alone any linking it to be a carcinogen. The information Erica provided WAS in fact correct, just for a different type of silica than the type of silica used in cosmetics.
Reply
You should do a post on the fact that Talc and Mineral Oil is used in the 88 and 120 eyeshadow palette, Mineral Oil is highly comedogenic and bad for the skin.
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
March 11th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
I’ll write a blog about mineral oil right now, actually. Check back in 15-20
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
March 11th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Also wrote a blog on talc.
Reply
I have only one problem with bloggers who believe companies wouldn’t sell silica cosmetic products knowing the products “may be” potentially dangerous. The analogy would be something like cigarette companies wouldn’t sell cigarettes if they knew it was potentially dangerous. The fact is nobody knows the long term effects of silica cosmetics ingested (primarily into the lungs) at this point and time. There are no long term studies that exists. The same thing happened with silicone implants years ago. Tuned out to be very hazardous.
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
April 6th, 2009 at 10:26 pm
@yone, if you read the blog, it’s irrelevant to companies, it’s directed at FDA standards. Silica microspheres are not only prevelant in may cosmetics (and when used as directed, do not cause harm, there is a particle size restriction for its use in loose powders), but also in many drugs and medications. Being as microspheres are in these medications, it does go through strenuous testing. Silica microspheres come from sand, and is the second most common mineral on the planet. The studies you speak of are from a different form of silica that does not come from sand. Filing through the research is obnoxious, but what I’ve provided is merely a mole hill compared to the mountain I’ve spent hours reading. Links to some have been provided, I did neglect many of the links stating silica to be hazardous, simply because it’s a different form, and therefore irrelevant to my research. Next, as for cigarettes, they do have a Surgeon’s General Warning, and again, companies are not the point of this post — just our FDA, and the FDA where other companies (like MUFE) are based. It is a requirement for any sort of drug and cosmetic to put if their ingredients have not been tested for safety. Next, I’d imagine since silica has been used for years, we would notice some of the long term effects (had there been proof of any, I’d bet people who frequently visit the beach would be the first to go), I myself have been using silica based powders for over 10 years — just imagine how many women for longer. Again, this blog was based research and regulations, NOT companies. Most bloggers don’t bother doing research as much as stating opinions.
Reply
yone Reply:
April 7th, 2009 at 12:35 am
@MollyLoretta,
Sorry, it seems I’ve offended you. That wasn’t my intention. I agree that most bloggers state opinions and are not researchers. I am a research writer, though not in the cosmetics field. All I was trying to convey is that “I” question not only companies, but even the FDA standards. They cannot keep up with all that’s out there on the market whether it be research or what have you. As for the cigarette issue and the surgeon general’s warning that cigarettes may be hazardous to your health. We all know it’s hazardous, but it’s still on the market. Silica doesn’t have a warning right now by the FDA,
but it takes a very long time to get a warning of that kind unless people are getting ill from whatever product right now with absolute certainty. I guess what I’m trying to say is that I don’t know if silica in the form you’re describing is safe and maybe 20 years from now we will. It took so long for even asbestos to be declared deadly by the EPA and there were too many other instances being regulated by various departments that failed to identify deadly or harmful agents. Believe me when I say I’d love to use silica based products on my face that makes my skin look great. BUT, am I sure it’s safe…. no, I don’t. The US FDA still hasn’t banned hydrogenated oil as most of Europe has. I’m just pointing out that even regulatory agencies don’t get it right for many reasons. So, are you saying that because silica is FDA regulated, it makes it safe to use?
Reply
MollyLoretta Reply:
April 7th, 2009 at 5:34 am
@yone, I’m saying based on hours of research and over 20 years of very strenuous testing show absolutely NO side effects from inhalation, injection, injestion, and topical use of approved cosmetic grade silica. No results yield anything remotely similar to crystalline forms of silica, they’re not even the same chemical make up — at all. Silica has been used for so long with no skin irritating concerns aside from the rare allergic reaction, and other tests show nothing. When cosmetic grade was tested alongside industrial grade, awful results from the industrial, and again — nothing from cosmetic.
It’s like the obnoxious posts stating mineral oil as a skin irritant, but it’s actually considered by the dermatology field to be the safest and most gentle humectant on the market.
Reply
With due respect to you as a cosmetologist doing this kind of internet research, you make a great case for cosmetic grade silica. Thanks for the read and allowing me to express my concerns on companies (sorry it was off topic in this blog) and ANY government regulatory agency. I edit many of these reports (not in the cosmetic field) and am cynical about how many of the regulatory agencies really conduct themselves.
Reply
Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog.
Cheers! Sandra. R.
Reply
I have to say that I have always loved what cosmetics and skincare has done for me, but some time difficult to find the right products for my skin.
Your posting very useful for me.
Thanks
Dile
Reply